3-D Airfoil CFD Simulation, ANSYS Fluent Training
$60.00 $24.00 Student Discount
This project presents a CFD simulation of airflow over an airfoil using ANSYS Fluent. The computational mesh was refined near the airfoil to capture boundary layer effects, and the k–ω SST turbulence model was applied for accurate prediction of lift and drag. The results highlight the pressure distribution, velocity field, and aerodynamic performance of the airfoil.
Click on Add To Cart and obtain the Geometry file, Mesh file, and a Comprehensive ANSYS Fluent Training Video.To Order Your Project or benefit from a CFD consultation, contact our experts via email (info@mr-cfd.com), online support tab, or WhatsApp at +44 7443 197273.
There are some Free Products to check our service quality.
If you want the training video in another language instead of English, ask it via info@mr-cfd.com after you buy the product.
Description
3-D Airfoil CFD Simulation
The focus of this research study lies in observing the action of aerodynamic flow around an airfoil by utilizing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) in the ANSYS Fluent framework. Airfoils serve critical roles in both aircraft and turbine blades, where their aerodynamic effectiveness plays a dominant role in determining the properties of lift and drag. This study places its focus on pressure distribution, velocity fields, and wake patterns developed behind the airfoil for known flow conditions. CFD represents an efficient and accurate technique, allowing for modeling of flow dynamics virtually without requiring expensive experimental processes.
Project Description
This project is going to study an incompressible isothermal air flow adjacent to a 3-D airfoil. The geometry is a 0.5-meter airfoil inside a wind tunnel. Also, the maximum speed of 10 m/s is selected for the inlet.
Geometry and Mesh
The geometry was created by placing a NACA-type airfoil profile at the center of a rectangular computational domain. The domain extends sufficiently far from the airfoil to avoid boundary effects on the region of interest. The inlet boundary represents the uniform free-stream flow, while the outlet acts as a pressure-outlet condition. The upper, lower, and side walls are treated as far-field or symmetry boundaries.
The mesh for the computational domain was generated using ANSYS Meshing. Unstructured triangular elements were employed with significant refinement in the vicinity of the airfoil. Fine mesh spacing around the leading edge, upper and lower surfaces, and trailing edge ensures accurate resolution of the boundary layer and wake region. The element size gradually increases toward the far-field boundaries, thereby reducing the total number of elements while maintaining accuracy in critical regions. The final mesh consists of approximately 380,000 nodes and over 2.1 million elements, providing a good compromise between computational cost and accuracy.CFD Simulation Settings
The simulation was carried out in ANSYS Fluent using a pressure-based, steady-state solver. The working fluid was air with constant physical properties, including a density of 1.225 kg/m³ and viscosity of 0.001003 Pa·s.
- Boundary Conditions:
- Inlet: Velocity inlet = 10 m/s
- Outlet: Pressure outlet (atmospheric reference)
- Airfoil walls: No-slip condition
- Far-field boundaries: Symmetry
- Solver Properties:
- Pressure–velocity coupling: SIMPLE algorithm
- Pressure interpolation scheme: Second-order
- Momentum and turbulence equations: Second -order upwind
- Initialization: Standard initialization from the inlet
- Number of iterations: 1000 (default relaxation factors)
This setup ensures a stable convergence while capturing the velocity and pressure distributions over the airfoil with acceptable computational cost.
3-D Airfoil CFD Simulation Results and Discussions
The simulation results provide a detailed view of the pressure and velocity fields around the airfoil. The pressure contour demonstrates a high-pressure stagnation region at the leading edge, where the incoming flow directly impinges on the surface. On the upper surface of the airfoil, the pressure drops significantly as the flow accelerates, leading to a low-pressure region that is primarily responsible for generating lift. In contrast, the lower surface maintains relatively higher-pressure values, creating a clear pressure differential that results in a net upward aerodynamic force.
The velocity contour shows accelerated flow over the suction side (upper surface) and a velocity deficit that develops in the wake region at the trailing edge. The wake is characterized by vortical structures and energy loss, which contribute to aerodynamic drag. The k–ω SST turbulence model successfully captured the flow separation near the trailing edge under the given angle of attack, thereby predicting realistic lift and drag behavior.
Quantitative analysis of aerodynamic coefficients confirmed the increase in lift with flow acceleration over the upper surface as well as the contribution of viscous shear and wake formation to the overall drag. The mesh refinement near the airfoil surface played a crucial role in resolving the boundary layer accurately, which ensured reliable predictions of aerodynamic performance.
Reviews
You must be logged in to post a review.
Call On WhatsApp
Adelia Lindgren –
I appreciate the level of detail in the simulation setup and results. The figures provided deep insight into airfoil behavior in various flow circumstances. Can you recommend this course to someone interested in aerospace simulations?
MR CFD Support –
Thank you for your kind words! We’re glad to hear that you found the course detail-oriented and insightful. Definitely, anyone interested in aerospace simulations or seeking to understand aerodynamics and flow behavior around airfoil structures would benefit from this course. We appreciate your recommendation!
Miss Allison Jast –
The CFD training material was brilliantly detailed, especially the contour and streamline visualizations provided made it exceptionally intuitive to understand complex airflow interactions with the airfoil.
MR CFD Support –
Thank you for your positive feedback! It’s great to hear that the visualizations were helpful in understanding the simulation results. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask. Your success is our goal at MR CFD.
Hal Denesik III –
I am truly amazed by the 3-D Airfoil CFD Simulation empowers us with precise control over aero properties. The convergence to steady measurements of drag and lift provides confidence in the accuracy of results. Fantastic quality and edification from MR CFD Company’s learning product!
MR CFD Support –
Thank you for your kind words and for recognizing the quality of our 3-D Airfoil CFD Simulation. We’re thrilled to hear that our product has provided you with valuable insights and met your expectations. Your satisfaction is our main goal, and we appreciate you taking the time to leave this positive review!
Miss Billie Legros DVM –
The detail in the 3-D Airfoil CFD analysis is clear and shows a great effort. The analysis of lift and drag along with the monitoring of convergence is quite professional. The setup to achieve a well-developed turbulent boundary layer using prism layers is commendable as is the thoughtful selection of a SST k-omega model for the simulation.
MR CFD Support –
We appreciate your in-depth and encouraging review! It’s great to hear that you are satisfied with the level of detail and accuracy in our 3-D Airfoil CFD simulation. We always aim to provide thorough analyses, ensuring our customers can trust in the professionalism and precision of our simulations. Thank you for taking the time to share your positive experience.
Ms. Bert Crooks –
I recently completed the 3-D Airfoil CFD Simulation with the ANSYS Fluent software based on the training provided by MR CFD and I’m thoroughly impressed with the comprehensive and detailed approach. From geometry creation to mesh generation and all the way through to convergence monitoring, this project has significantly enhanced my understanding of aerospace simulations. The results show a convincing representation of aerodynamic forces which aligns perfectly with theoretical expectations. A special shout out for including the k-w-SST turbulence model which closely predicted the realistic physical phenomena encountered by an actual airfoil.
MR CFD Support –
We’re delighted to know that our 3-D Airfoil CFD Simulation training gave you such a valuable insight into aerospace simulations and that you’re satisfied with the results and theoretical alignment. Your mention of the k-w-SST turbulence model’s effectiveness is certainly appreciated; we aim to incorporate realistic modeling for our users’ learning benefits. Thank you for taking the time to share your positive experience!
Gillian Pfannerstill –
The level of detail in the project is reflect applications. Can you tell me about the understanding of airfoil behaviors at different angles of attack?
MR CFD Support –
While the review does not specifically mention simulations at varying angles of attack, the understanding of airfoil behavior for different angles can usually be investigated by setting up separate simulation cases. Each case would have the airfoil at a different orientation with respect to the incoming airflow. These simulations can provide insight into the lift, drag, and moment coefficients at various angles, which are essential for characterizing the airfoil’s aerodynamic performance. Should you be interested in learning more about the effects of angle of attack on airfoil performance, you might want to consider exploring customized simulation services that focus on parametric studies.