Transonic Linear Turbine Cascade at Off-Design Conditions, Paper Numerical Validation

$420.00 Student Discount

The present project’s results are compared with the experimental results of the paper “Midspan Flow-Field Measurements for Two Transonic Linear Turbine Cascades at Off-Design Conditions”. Turbulence modeling and Computational procedures (boundary conditions, etc.) are simulated based on the article “Numerical study of the flow field through a transonic linear turbine cascade at design and off-design conditions”.

Special Offers For Single Product

If you need the Geometry designing and Mesh generation training video for one product, you can choose this option.
If you need expert consultation through the training video, this option gives you 1-hour technical support.
The journal file in ANSYS Fluent is used to record and automate simulations for repeatability and batch processing.
editable geometry and mesh allows users to create and modify geometry and mesh to define the computational domain for simulations.
The case and data files in ANSYS Fluent store the simulation setup and results, respectively, for analysis and post-processing.
Geometry, Mesh, and CFD Simulation methodologygy explanation, result analysis and conclusion
The MR CFD certification can be a valuable addition to a student resume, and passing the interactive test can demonstrate a strong understanding of CFD simulation principles and techniques related to this product.

Description

Paper Description

The present problem simulates the two-dimensional compressible flow field through a transonic linear turbine cascade. The present project’s results are compared with the experimental results of the paper “Midspan Flow-Field Measurements for Two Transonic Linear Turbine Cascades at Off-Design Conditions.” Turbulence modeling and Computational procedures (boundary conditions, etc.) are simulated based on the article “Numerical study of the flow field through a transonic linear turbine cascade at design and off-design conditions.” In this project, inlet and outlet boundaries were considered as pressure inlet and pressure outlet, respectively, and Periodic boundary conditions were applied to simulate flow through the cascade.

In both references, the ratio of exit static pressure to inlet total pressure (P2/Pt1) was specified, but the total pressure and temperature were not specified. Therefore, at the inlet, the total pressure (Pt1) of 50KPa and the total temperature (Tt1) of 288K were considered, and the static pressure was calculated by the given pressure ratio in the papers. Also, the standard k-ε model and standard wall function were used to predict turbulent quantities. The density-based solver was selected due to the compressibility of flow. It should be noted that the ideal gas model was exploited to account for the airflow density changes due to the temperature changes.

Transonic Linear Turbine Cascade Geometry & Mesh

The geometry of this model is designed in ANSYS design modeler® and is meshed in ANSYS meshing®. The mesh type used for this geometry is structured and the element number is 27066. Also, the mesh cells around the blades are smaller to make the results more accurate.

transonic

Transonic Linear Turbine Cascade CFD simulation settings

The key assumptions considered in this project are:

  • Simulation is done using density-based solver.
  • The present simulation and its results are steady.
  • The effect of gravity has been ignored.

The applied settings are summarized in the following table.

 
Models
Viscous model k-epsilon
k-epsilon model Standard
Wall treatment Standard wall function
Energy model On
Boundary conditions
Inlet Pressure inlet
Gauge pressure 50 kPa
Supersonic/initial gauge pressure 500 kPa
Temperature 288 K
Outlets Pressure outlet
Gauge pressure 35200 Pa
Temperature 288 K
Walls
wall motion stationary wall
Heat flux 0 W/m2
Solution Methods
Formulation Implicit
Flux type Roe-FDS
flow first order upwind
Turbulent kinetic energy first order upwind
Specific dissipation rate first order upwind
Initialization
Initialization method   Hybrid

Paper Results

At the end of this simulation, the results of the present work are compared with results obtained by the paper. For this purpose, the diagram in figure 7 and, Table 5 of the paper “Midspan Flow-Field Measurements for Two Transonic Linear Turbine Cascades at Off-Design Conditions” were used.

transonic

Table 1: Exit Mach number at different pressure ratio, design and off-design incidence

i-ides P2/Pt1 P2 M2
Experimental 0 0.704 0.71
Present Work 0 0.704 35.2KPa 0.678
Experimental 10 0.416 1.15
Present Work 10 0.416 20.8KPa 1.106
Experimental 0 0.479 1.06
Present Work 0 0.479 23.95KPa 1.014
Experimental 10 0.721 0.68
Present Work 10 0.721 36.05KPa 0.633

transonic

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Leave a customer review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back To Top
Search
Whatsapp Call On WhatsApp
Udemy