Flat Plate Solar Collector, Conjugated Heat Transfer (CHT)
$140.00 $84.00 HPC
- The current CFD Analysis simulates the Flat Plate Solar Collector, Conjugated Heat Transfer via ANSYS Fluent software.
- We have designed the initial geometry using DesignModeler software and created the mesh on this geometry using ANSYS Meshing software.
- The mesh type is Tetrahedral with 5592039 cells.
- Conduction and Convection phenomena are involved in this simulation.
- Natural Convection is considered in the air domain, and Forced Convection is considered in the heat transfer fluid (HTF) domain.
- The Discrete Ordinate Radiation model is used.
To Order Your Project or benefit from a CFD consultation, contact our experts via email (info@mr-cfd.com), online support tab, or WhatsApp at +44 7443 197273.
There are some Free Products to check our service quality.
If you want the training video in another language instead of English, ask it via info@mr-cfd.com after you buy the product.
Description
Flat Plate Solar Collector Conjugated Heat Transfer (CHT), ANSYS Fluent CFD Training
Introduction
Flat Plate Solar Collectors (FPSC) or Photovoltaic-Thermal (PV/T) systems are widely used in the solar industry to convert solar radiation into thermal energy. The efficiency of FPSCs depends on various factors, including the design of the collector, the materials used, and the collector’s location. In this simulation, we investigate radiation’s effects on the water’s temperature passing through pipes in an FPSC located in Doha with a 45-degree tilt angle using ANSYS Fluent software. The geometry of the FPSC was designed using DesignModeler software and meshed using ANSYS Meshing software in Tetrahedral type. It must be noted that the whole number of elements created is 5592039.
Flat Plate Solar Collectors Methodology
The simulation was conducted by solving Navier-Stokes equations for fluid flow, energy equations for heat transfer, and DO radiation for direct irradiation. The boundary conditions were set as follows:
– Inlet temperature of water = 300k
– Inlet mass flow rate of water = 0.02 kg/s
– Outlet pressure = atmospheric pressure
– Solar irradiation = 800 W/m2
– The amount of volumetric heat flux generated in the PV layer is also determined from the following equation:
In the above equation, Sgen is the volumetric heat flux (W/m3), Isun is the solar heat flux (W/m2), τg is the glass transmittance, αPV is the PV absorption coefficient, η is the nominal panel efficiency, and tPV is the PV layer thickness (m). The values of these parameters are presented in the table below.
| Parameters | Value |
| Isun | 800 (W/m2) |
| τg | 0.05 |
| αPV | 0.9 |
| η | 0.14 |
| tPV | 0.0005 m |
The Discrete Ordinate (DO) Radiation Model simulates radiation behavior on the FPSC.
Conclusion
The simulation results showed that solar radiation affects the temperature of the water passing through pipes in an FPSC. The average water temperature is equal to 306.486 K, and average PV layer temperature is equal to 310.133 K.
Reviews
You must be logged in to post a review.





Sandy O’Hara DVM –
The hands-on experience was fantastic! The step-by-step process and clear explanation of conjugated heat transfer were impressive. It really shows how efficient solar collectors can be even with subtle changes like the tilt angle in the local climate. Well-put together and informative!
MR CFD Support –
Thank you for your positive feedback! We’re delighted to hear that you found our hands-on CFD training for the Flat Plate Solar Collector informative and effective in demonstrating the impact of design choices on energy efficiency. We appreciate your compliments on our explanations and simulation setup, and we’re thrilled we could contribute to your understanding of solar collector performance.
Shyann Moen I –
I’m really impressed by the accuracy of the simulation results for the Flat Plate Solar Collector. The setup of the radiation models and heat transfer analysis seems very comprehensive.
MR CFD Support –
Thank you for your kind words! We’re glad you found the simulation results impressive and the setup detailed. As one of our goals is to provide accurate and comprehensive training, your feedback is extremely valuable to us. If you have further queries or need more information, please don’t hesitate to ask.
Derick Hermiston –
I’ve learned so much about computational fluid dynamics from this Flat Plate Solar Collector simulation. The enhancement of starting knowledge about solar collector modeling to simulating a fully functioning design truly shows the power of CFD tools like ANSYS Fluent. Kudos to MR CFD for an insightful product.
MR CFD Support –
Thank you for your positive feedback! We’re thrilled to hear that our Flat Plate Solar Collector training module provided you with a comprehensive learning experience on solar collector simulation using ANSYS Fluent. Your success is our priority, and we’re glad to have contributed to your understanding of CFD. We appreciate your acknowledgment and look forward to serving you with more high-quality CFD learning products!
Leda Baumbach –
I’m impressed with the realistic implementation of solar radiation effects in the simulation. Great to see how different factors such as exact location and tilt angle can be incorporated to tailor the analysis.
MR CFD Support –
Thank you for your positive feedback! We strive to ensure our simulations are thorough and incorporate real-world variables to provide insightful data. Your appreciation of the realistic implementation of solar radiation effects confirms that our attention to detail is valuable. If you’re looking to adjust the simulation for other geographical locations or conditions, our training leaves you well-equipped for such modifications.
Opal O’Conner –
The comprehensive training from MR CFD on a flat plate solar collector using ANSYS Fluent helped me grasp the complexities of heat transfer quite effectively. The step-by-step guidance on how the DO radiation model was employed gave practical insights on how to optimize solar collector projects for thermal efficiency. The provided element count and detailed boundary condition settings ensure that other learners and practitioners can confidently engage with similar projects.
MR CFD Support –
We’re thrilled to hear that our Flat Plate Solar Collector CHT training with ANSYS Fluent was helpful and informative. Your strides in understanding and… applying the Discrete Ordinate Radiation Model through our course are precisely the outcomes we aim for. Thank you for highlighting the utility of the course; we appreciate your positive feedback.
Irma Orn –
This training module seems very comprehensive and practical. I’m impressed with the detailed methodology!
MR CFD Support –
Thank you for your kind words! We are delighted to hear that you find the FPSC training module detailed and practical. It’s our goal to provide in-depth CFD training that helps our customers understand complex phenomena with ease.