Thermal Effect on Mixing, CFD Simulation ANSYS Fluent Training
$80.00 Student Discount
This project investigates the thermal effect of mixing Glycerin & Water-liquid via ANSYS Fluent, and the results of this simulation have been analyzed.
Click on Add To Cart and obtain the Geometry file, Mesh file, and a Comprehensive ANSYS Fluent Training Video. By the way, You can pay in installments through Klarna, Afterpay (Clearpay), and Affirm.If you decide to use PayPal to pay, you will get a 5% discount on your order.
To Order Your Project or benefit from a CFD consultation, contact our experts via email ([email protected]), online support tab, or WhatsApp at +44 7443 197273.
There are some Free Products to check our service quality.
If you want the training video in another language instead of English, ask it via [email protected] after you buy the product.
Description
Thermal Effect on Mixing Problem Description
This project investigates the thermal effect of mixing Glycerin & Water-liquid. The study aims to determine the effect of applying heat flux on a Y-shape pipe. First, the problem is solved without any heat flux, and then a different heat flux is applied.
Geometry & Mesh
The 3D geometry is designed in Ansys Design Modeler. There are two inlets for water-liquid and glycerin. After getting in contact with each other, they interact 10-meter long pipe. In addition, the mesh grid is carried out using Ansys Meshing software.
CFD Simulation
Several assumptions have been considered, including:
- The simulation is Steady to capture fluid behavior in a steady-state manner.
- The pressure-based solver type was used due to the incompressibility of the working fluid.
- Gravitational acceleration effects were ignored.
The following table represents a summary of the solution:
Models(Viscous) | ||||
Multiphase | Volume of Fluid (VOF) | |||
Formulation | Implicit | |||
Interface Modeling Type | Sharp | |||
Number of Eulerian Phases | 2 | |||
Energy | On | |||
Viscous | k-epsilon Realizable | Standard Wall Function | ||
Materials | ||||
Definition method | Fluent database | |||
Material name | Water-liquid, Glycerin | |||
Cell zone condition | ||||
Material name | Mixture | |||
Boundary condition | ||||
Inlet-1 | Type | Mass-flow-inlet | ||
Phase-1 | ||||
Mass flow rate | 0.15 m/s | |||
Phase-2 | ||||
Mass flow rate | 0 | |||
Inlet-2 | Type | Mass-flow-inlet | ||
Phase-1 | ||||
Mass flow rate | 0 | |||
Phase-2 | ||||
Mass flow rate | 0.15 m/s | |||
Outlet | Type | Pressure outlet | ||
Guage Pressure | 0 | |||
Wall
Wall inlet-1 Wall inlet-2 |
Type | Wall | ||
Thermal Condition | Heat Flux | |||
Solver configuration | ||||
Pressure-velocity coupling | Scheme | Coupled | ||
Spatial Discretization | Gradient | Least squares cell-based | ||
Pressure | PRESTO | |||
Momentum | First-order upwind | |||
Turbulent kinetic energy | First-order upwind | |||
Turbulent dissipation rate | First-order upwind | |||
Volume Fraction | Compressive | |||
Initialization | Initialization methods | Standard Initialization | ||
Run calculation | Number of Iteration | 2000 | ||
Thermal Effect on Mixing Results
After the simulation, 2-dimensional contours of both volume fractions are extracted. Plus, a plot indicating the volume fraction of phase 1, which is water-liquid, through the centerline of the outlet, is shown below. Indeed, the viscosity of glycerin is highly dependent on temperature, as illustrated in Fig.3. Applying a heat flux on pipe walls increases the temperature and decreases the glycerin viscosity. As a result, it has less surface interaction (viscous forces) and resistance through water-liquid and causes better mixing (see Fig.4). The plot shows that by applying 30000-watt heat flux, the volume fraction of water liquid gets higher at each point which illustrates the presence of water where it was not before. Moreover, The contours show that, due to the low thermal conductivity of glycerin, the temperature of central points remains approximately constant. In other words, by using a highly conductive fluid, the impact of thermal conditions on mixing would be more impressive.
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.