Magnetic Field Effect on Nanofluid Heat Transfer (MHD)
$315.00 Student Discount
In this project, nanofluid flows in a solid aluminum channel in the presence of an applied magnetic field.
Description
Magnetic Field Effect on Nanofluid Heat Transfer (MHD), ANSYS Fluent CFD Simulation Training (3-D)
In this project, nanofluid flows in a solid aluminum channel in the presence of an applied magnetic field are simulated by ANSYS Fluent software. Fluid flow is steady and is simulated as one single-phase flow, however, the thermophysical properties of nanofluid are calculated using the below formulas. The surface average of the nanofluid’s temperature is equal to 293.2 and 304.175K at the inlet and outlet, respectively.
where
Geometry and mesh
The geometry of the fluid domain is designed in Design Modeler and the computational grid is generated using Ansys Meshing. The mesh type is unstructured and the element number is 26000.
CFD Simulation
Critical assumptions:
- The solver type is assumed Pressure Based.
- Time formulation is assumed Steady.
- Gravity effects are neglected.
The following table is a summary of the defining steps of the problem and its solution.
Solver configurationModels |
||
Energy | On | |
Viscous | K-epsilon (standard) | Standard wall function |
MHD model | MHD method | Magnetic induction |
Solution control | Solve MHD equation (on) | |
Include Lorentz force (on) | ||
Include Joule heating (on) | ||
Under relaxation (0.9) | ||
Boundary condition | Solid outer wall (insulating wall) | |
Fluid-solid interface (coupled wall) | ||
External field B0 | B0 input option (patch) | |
B0 component | Bx amplitude (1T) | |
By amplitude (0T) | ||
By amplitude (1T) | ||
Solver configurationMaterials |
||
Fluid | Definition method | Fluent Database |
Material name | NanoFluid (based on water, with modification) | |
Density | 1312 kg/m3 | |
Specific heat (Cp) | 3248 J/kg.K | |
Thermal conductivity | 1.09387 w/m.K | |
Viscosity | 0.0011 kg/m.s | |
UDS diffusivity | constant | |
Electrical conductivity | 1000000 siemens/m | |
Magnetic permeability | 1.257e-6 | |
Solid | Definition method | Fluent Database |
Material name | Al (based on Aluminum with modification) | |
Density | 2719 kg/m3 | |
Specific heat (Cp) | 871 J/kg.K | |
Thermal conductivity | 202.4 w/m.K | |
UDS diffusivity | constant | |
Electrical conductivity | 3.541e7 siemens/m | |
Magnetic permeability | 1.257e-6 | |
Solver configurationCell zone conditions |
||
Fluid | Material name | NanoFluid |
Source terms | Mass (0) | |
X momentum (1) | ||
Y momentum (1) | ||
Z momentum (1) | ||
Turbulent kinetic energy (0) | ||
Turbulent dissipation rate (0) | ||
Energy (1) | ||
B_x (1) | ||
B_y (1) | ||
B_z (1) | ||
Solid | Material name | Aluminum |
Source terms | Energy (2)
1.      UDF MHD energy source 2.      1000000 w/m3 |
|
B_x (1) | ||
B_y (1) | ||
B_z (1) | ||
Solver configurationBoundary conditions |
||
Inlet | Type | Velocity inlet |
Velocity magnitude | 1 m/s | |
Turbulence intensity | 5% | |
Turbulent viscosity ratio | 10 | |
Temperature | 293.2 K | |
Outer Wall solid | Temperature | 320 K |
Solver configurations | ||
Pressure-velocity coupling | Scheme | SIMPLE |
Spatial discretization | Gradient | Least square cell-based |
Pressure | Second order | |
Momentum | Second order Upwind | |
Turbulent kinetic energy | First order upwind | |
Turbulent dissipation rate | First order upwind | |
Energy | Second order Upwind | |
B_x | First order upwind | |
B_y | First order upwind | |
B_z | First order upwind | |
Initialization | X velocity | 1 m/s |
Temperature | 293.2 K |
Magnetic Field Effect on Nanofluid Heat Transfer Results and discussion
The nanofluid flow average temperature at the inlet and out location is 293.2 and 304.175K respectively. In case of no magnetic field affecting the nano-fluid, the temperature at the outlet decreases to 303.74K. Heat flux to nanofluid is equal to 112102.2 w/m2.
Comparison between outlet temperature of nano-fluid in the presence and absence of magnetic field, reveals the effectiveness of magnetic field application in the present work. Magnetic field application increases outlet temperature by 1K and heat transfer to nano-fluid by 200w/m2.
Demond Langosh –
Can this simulation be used to estimate the energy consumption of the heat exchanger?
MR CFD Support –
While the current simulation does not directly estimate the energy consumption, it can provide valuable insights into the pressure drop across the heat exchanger, which can be used to estimate the energy consumption.
Sylvia Waelchi –
Can this simulation be extended to model transient heat transfer scenarios?
MR CFD Support –
Yes, this simulation can be extended to model transient heat transfer scenarios. We are open to contributions and can accommodate your desired simulations.
Ward Luettgen –
How does the simulation model the pressure drop across the heat exchanger?
MR CFD Support –
The simulation models the pressure drop across the heat exchanger using the momentum equations, which capture the resistance to the flow caused by the heat exchanger.
Miss Charlotte DuBuque V –
Can this simulation be used to predict the performance of the heat exchanger at different operating conditions?
MR CFD Support –
Yes, the simulation can be used to predict the performance of the heat exchanger at different operating conditions. This is an important capability for the design and analysis of heat exchangers.